data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78104/78104252c6c3eacfb9c8797c835727bb2bb2e264" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69f1b/69f1b9bcf96cddb4bf05b1b033fc7ca1c1e0b1cd" alt=""
Went on a photography course a few weeks ago to try and improve my
DSLR skills. Off to Arizona soon so hopefully will come in handy with getting some passerine shots. Well, I am supposed to be shooting in manual program (controlling my aperture and shutter), shooting in raw, concentrating on my histograms, supposed to be using a mac instead of a
pc, concentrating on post production using
photoshop (like a modern day dark room) and ensuring that post production is subtle and effective. Well, I have given up on nearly everything and gone back to my old ways-
jpegs,
pcs, ignoring histograms and shooting in auto- I would miss the photo if I bothered with all that. However I do like
photoshop, although I am not sure whether the above photo would be classified as subtle and effective. Can you see the subtle changes?
No comments:
Post a Comment